ssanagav (Friday 20th of June 2008 11:20:29 AM)

is it always the question about 'if it is best for america' ? is it not about universal justice ? what if it is really that most people held are actually innocent as claimed by amnesty ?

XMansv (Wednesday 14th of May 2008 11:54:42 PM)

There probably are some innocent people being held. There are probably a lot more evil moslem psychopathic murdering terrorist cowards. They ought to do some reasonable investigation, figure out who is who the best they can, let the innocents go and shot the others. Next!

ikekll (Tuesday 13th of May 2008 09:13:59 PM)

As many as 120 Guantánamo detainees were from Pakistan. Regular people working jobs in humanitarian aid charities. They weren't captured in battle by "coalition forces" as we were led to believe. The US military offered bounty payments to Musharraf in return for AlQueda & Taliban members. These men aren't terrorists. They were rounded up by their own & sold for bounty to the US military. THEY became the warm bodies to be flaunted as "terrorists" to support the "war of terror." STRIKE 3

ikekll (Tuesday 13th of May 2008 08:57:17 PM)

"During the last six years, the U.S. Administration has held nearly 800 alleged terror suspects without trial at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. 500 of these men have now been released, but their stories - and the stories of those who remain - are largely unknown. Fragments have emerged in books and interviews, and in declassified accounts from the detainees' lawyers, but until now there has been no comprehensive overview of all their cases..."

ikekll (Tuesday 13th of May 2008 08:58:58 PM)

In The Guantánamo Files, based on a detailed analysis of over 8,000 pages of transcripts released by the Pentagon, Andy Worthington, a London-based historian and journalist, brings to life Guantánamo's largely anonymous detainees. Life at Guantánamo Bay (NewAmericaFoundation) watch?v=3_ZhnK03nOY

truthseeker83 (Wednesday 15th of August 2007 02:15:02 PM)

lol perfect logic. all those critisisms are baseless so the critics of guantanamo bay won't be happy if we close it. wtf

huskythehusky (Saturday 28th of July 2007 01:33:15 AM)

LOL... what stupid conservative group is behind this company?

pubuman (Thursday 26th of July 2007 01:05:44 AM)

wtf? what processes and lawyers? The Geneva convention is blatently violated, there are people there for years without trial. People are arrested ON FORGEIN SOIL where the US has no juridiction. People are kept with no evidence and are tortured till they say something! Obviously if you get constantly tortured you are gonna tell them what they want to hear!

XMansv (Wednesday 14th of May 2008 11:57:55 PM)

Foreign soil where the US has no jusrisdiction? You are mixing up criminal law and war. Its not the same thing. Those aren't cops out in the streets of Chicago, they are soldiers in a foreign country during war and occupation. Think, think, think!

pubuman (Thursday 15th of May 2008 02:46:53 AM)

The US is at war. But unless the people captured are not specificly done so in the batter field, i.e. after a battle, firefight etc other arrests require, by the Geneva convention, adequate reason and count as legal arrests, so the US cannot capture them, they need to be arrested localally and extradited, after a hearing. If they are taken away from the country of capture, other than back to their own country this is illegal! US isnt bound by the Geneva convention? It's commiting war crimes.